tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4538201442823416834.post6408105722273389512..comments2023-08-08T08:02:56.747-07:00Comments on okcblunder: Husky Mid-season Report Cardauroraavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10510057641412459509noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4538201442823416834.post-73631928924642544752009-10-13T20:03:02.489-07:002009-10-13T20:03:02.489-07:00"Based on last year's F grade, this team ..."Based on last year's F grade, this team has shown vast improvements. With the next Husky win you can start the "Sark for PAC-10 Coach of the Year" hype machine. If they get to a bowl game we're talking National Coach of the Year. Locker is on pace to be the PAC-10's Offensive Player of the Year."<br /><br />Couldn't agree with you more, especially if they do all of the mentioned above. They still have some work to do, but I love the progress they're making. It won't be long till we see these grades improve.<br /><br />GO DAWGS!JAWAnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4538201442823416834.post-41490344253837222782009-10-12T21:18:19.867-07:002009-10-12T21:18:19.867-07:00Seems pretty accurate, although they are totally b...Seems pretty accurate, although they are totally better than last season, ugh. Go! huskies!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4538201442823416834.post-33253312082683813042009-10-11T12:50:11.004-07:002009-10-11T12:50:11.004-07:00Your report card ridiculous for this reason..... I...Your report card ridiculous for this reason..... If USC were 3-3 at this point in the season, would your grades be as high as they are for the Dawgs? If your answer is that they would be lower, then I would assume that would be because you expect more from them. This was an 0-12 team that layed down on every Saturday. The improvement they have shown deserves all (or at least nearly all) A's. The same performance next year would not be as big of an accomplishment, and would not deserve all A's, but right now they earn A's in my book.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com